|
|
"A progressive politics is one which recognises the
historical conditions and the specified rules of a
practice, whereas..."
More about Foucault
|
-
Occupation:
truth/reality
-
Hobbies and Interests:
power, knowledge, history, discourse, causality, considering friendster as a panopticon, legos
-
Favorite Books:
dusty ones, http://www.surveillance-and-society.org/journalv1i3.htm
-
Favorite TV Shows:
http://users.pandora.be/laurent.s/cesuur/foucault_flash.htm
-
Zodiac Sign:
Libra
-
About Me:
A progressive politics is one which recognises the
historical conditions and the specified rules of a
practice, whereas other politics recognize only ideal
necessities, univocal determinations, or the free play of
individual initiatives.
-
Who I Want to Meet:
frontiers of a book [or a friendster] are never clear-
cut...it is caught up in a system of references
to other books, other texts, other sentences: it is a node
within a network . . . [a] network of references ---------
--------------------------------
me: mfoo1926@yahoo.com
|
 |
How you're connected:
| You |
 |
Foucault is in your extended network |
|
Foucault |
Featured Sponsor
See results for Foucault Foucault
|
young girl into a cultural revolution. you
go to hell,children of the repressive
hypothesis- you go to hell and you die.
point which seems fundamental to me:
neither ideology nor repression - for
example the statements [enonces] or
rather enunciations which have nothing
to do with ideology. Desiring-
assemblages have nothing to do with
repression. But evidently, in relation
to the system of power, I don't have
Michel's firmness, I fall into
vagueness, given the ambiguous status
that they have for me: in Surveiller et
Punir, Michel says that they normalise
and discipline; I would say that they
code and reterritorialise (I suppose
that there again there is more than a
difference in wording). But given my
primacy of desire over power, or the
secondary character that the systems of
power have for me, their operations
still have a repressive effect, since
they crush, not desire as a natural
given, but the points of desiring-
assemblages.
ma tete!
When we first met, it was over a spat
concerning truth politics and that
type 'o shizzle. But these days we
can just chill, politickin about
racism's polyvalent mobility, not to
mention the movement of forms of
discipline from institution to
institution! Yo, my man, when we
gonna tag team the Enlightenment?
Holla!